#VinylArthink Online Vote Open
From 16 October to 12 November
vote for your favourite Artworks
and you can win an Artink-book image
You can give a preference to one or more Artworks,
just clicking on the button “VOTE!”, Enter your e-mail and then validate
the vote via the link which will be sent on your email.
(NB: Without this last step the vote will not be recorded).
With the popular vote, Arthink editions wants to offer more recognition
to the artists, also taking into account the public judgment.
The first 15 Artworks will enter our first collection of the “Abook Image” publisher series.
(read more on the contest online page).
Painting of words, Painting books
Arthink presents the first Arthink-book collection:
12 artworks by Francesco Pezzuco.
The painting of Francesco Pezzuco has a deep and inextricable connection with the ‘word’ – and seeing the ‘word’ as a mystical sign loaded with importance in its own right.
His relationship with writing is often expressed directly through the representation of letters and numbers discharged by their semantic meaning, but loaded with profound evocative value.
Out of the union between a “painting of words” and our Arthink-Book – which are “books made of painting”- this collection of 12 works was born, free adaptation of the author of works from the cycle “The Invisible and the Tangible” made between 2015 and 2016.
And it is precisely because of the strong bond of his painting with the word that I wanted his presence in the Arthink-Book editorial necklace.
Arthink-Book’s superimposed frames create a new texture, which require the observer to have a clear perceptual position of the author’s formal questions. They transform the painting of Francesco into a path of circumscribed episodes, hyperdefinited, in a poetic contrast with the evanescence and the disenchantment that the artist wants to communicate.
I was born dipped inside the art and I live thank to the art in a place of perfect twin between art and nature : Sperlonga.
I choose a really plain way to be: self-taught.
I didn’t attend school of art, I always preferred the opposite: since I can remember i’ve tried to use art as a school. I remember the emotion of my first discoveries.. I was 10, it was 1967. The ruins of Villa of Tiberio in my town. I’ve always known that will be my way, but i truly decided only in the ‘80s .
In that period I was having different experiences and suddenly I found myself without a job. It was in that moment that I could really decide my life, and I’ve chosen. I decided to follow my true nature ,the artistic one, even if actually I’ve already started to make and expose my works.
I don’t use to follow particular models, even if I really like the philosophical thought of Joseph Beyus. I don’t like the “workshop” and maybe not even the figure of the “master” as it usually conceived in my field.
I live the street. The street according to me is a real opencast workshop. I live, I look around, breathing inspiration.
The relationship between man and nature is written in the biosphere. Today we live in an opposition, a contrast, due to the loss of human identity, annihilated by the self-absorption and contempt for the environment.
The man… man is at the heart,is the coordinator of earthly things, for better or worse. But it is at the same time the author and the victim of irreparable damage, because in absolute term there is a lack of truly environment culture. Also for that I use to represent human figure from a silhouette edge.
My figures present an anomalous trait: the body splitted by the head. It’s because I believe that we are prisoners in an anachronistic node : “we feed” the body but not the head. I like to test, to put the skin in the game, also with myself. The constants elements, the one doesn’t change, are worthy for me.
I prefer to “derail” from track of standard to find the way of sacrality and lay spirituality, places and values taken from the contemporary man.
The Arthink-Book collection
In this collection you can find all the themes Pezzuco likes as a visual artist. Here he attempts to unite expressive decisions and philosophical accuracy/rigour in his work. The dichotomy between humankind and nature, the existential disorientation, the need of a real culture of environment.
The thought of an artist both strong and complex is expressed at its best thanks to the expressive rigour of the A-book (separated in squares, almost as if it were part of a series).